适合人群
经济学基础较强,对经济学、商科、金融兴趣浓厚的12年级及以下中学生
EAC,全称Economics Asia Convention,即亚洲经济学大会。EAC,由IE0日本组委-金融知力普及协会、IE0中国澳门组委-礼仕培育基金,及IE0中国区创始、成功举办前四届IEOC活动的ITCCC联手,联合东京大学、香港大学等权威学术单位专家共同发起,这不仅是一场专属于亚太区域的高水平经济学活动,更是向对经济学与商科满怀激情的中学生发出的荣耀召集令!
首届EAC国际站已于2024年3月在日本成功举办,来自中国香港、澳门,以及日本、阿联酋、泰国、新加坡等多个国家和地区的IEO精英代表与高中财经商界新星,齐聚东京。他们踏入具有历史意义的第18届奥运会会址-NYC国立奥林匹克纪念青少年综合中心,完成了一场为期7天的智慧碰撞与文化交融之旅。
通过国家队选拔测评,即有机会争夺20个中国国家队名额
经济学基础较强,对经济学、商科、金融兴趣浓厚的12年级及以下中学生
2026 年 2 月 7 日(周六)下午
2026年4月24 - 30日,日本·东京
线上笔试,经济学知识测评(Economics),个人为单位,150分钟
2026年1月20日
个人报名
学术大纲、样题、在线辅导课程及拓展阅读资料等
220元/人
活动形式:线上笔试学生限时1.5小时答题
题目类型:30道客观选择题(Multiple Choice Questions),每题4分,答错或未作答不扣分,满分120分
题目语言:英文
测评知识点:经济学70%/商学15%/金融知识15%,详见《中国区学术大纲》
国家队组建时间:2026年2月12日-28日
面向人群:根据国家队选拔测评,组建4支(5人/队)代表队
集训时间:拟定2026年4月前两周
活动形式:
1)线上集中课程(经济学前沿 x商业分析 x 国际沟通)
2)团队 Business Case 国内阶段设计
活动时间:2026年4月24日-30日
活动形式:日本东京,7天线下活动
活动内容:
1)学术测评(Economics Test)
2)团队商业案例路演(Business Case Challenge)
3)东京大学课程学习
4)文化交流与颁奖典礼
2026年EAC经济活动报名截止至2026年1月20日,如需报名参加活动,请抓紧时间!
团队学术表现:以所有挑战团队的“团队成绩”排名
• HIGH DISTINCTION:Top 10%
• DISTINCTION:Top 10%-30%
• MERIT:Top 30%-50%
• PARTICIPANT: 50%~
个人学术表现:以全体挑战者“个人成绩”排名
• HIGH DISTINCTION:Top 10%
• DISTINCTION:Top 10%-30%
• MERIT:Top 30%-50%
• PARTICIPANT: 50%~
EACC在线水平测试证书:每位学生均将获得电子证书
领取真题
个人学术表现: 以经济学进阶知识测评中的“个人成绩”排名
• CHAMPION
• 1ST RUNNER-UP
• 2ND RUNNER-UP
• HIGH DISTINCTION:Top 10%
• DISTINCTION:Top 10%-30%
• MERIT:Top 30%-50%
• PARTICIPANT: 50%~
个人综合学术表现:个人成绩50%+团队成绩50%
• EXCELLENCE IN OVERALL INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE:Top 10
团队学术表现: 以商业项目路演的“团队成绩”排名
• CHAMPION
• 1ST RUNNER-UP
• 2ND RUNNER-UP
• HIGH DISTINCTION:Top 10%
• DISTINCTION:Top 10%-30%
• MERIT:Top 30%-50%
• PARTICIPANT: 50%~
中国站学术表现证明:
• 所有到场挑战者将获得一份电子学术表现证书,以表彰他们在活动中的努力和
成果;
• 表现优异挑战者现场将被授予奖牌、奖杯等;
• 若团队中有队员在选拔日缺席,将仅根据实际参加的队员成绩进行计分。
中国队组建:将从中国站中遴选10位挑战者,组建代表队,于4月下旬飞赴日本东京,参加2026年EAC亚洲经济学大会国际站。 直通获邀:个人综合卓越表现(Top 10)得主将获得直通邀请资格 候选人:High Distinction及以上个人和团队进入侯选人行列
报名后可获得如下学术资料:EAC CHINA Syllabus(知识大纲)+样题(题目训练)+推荐阅读资料(在基础上补充提高)+教学视频(知识点梳理)
样题共包含30道客观选择题(Multiple Choice Questions),每道题4分。
1. Which of the following statement is correct?
A. When comparing with taxes levied on the quantity of pollutants emitted by firms, the obvious advantages of pollution permits is that no monitoring of firm’s emission is required.
B. When this is no externalities, a nationalized firm set output to maximise social welfare by making average revenue equals to marginal cost.
C. An age-related pension is included in the measurement of national income.
D. An increase in the total earnings will make it possible for the increase in real national output to increase in labor productivity.
Answer: B
A is wrong because the obvious advantages of pollution permit is that the reduction level is more predictable.
C is wrong because age-related pension is not included in the measurement of national income.
D is wrong because an increase in the total earnings will not necessarily make it possible for the increase in real national output to increase in labor productivity.
2. In an economy, the condition of pareto efficiency is realized. What does not necessarily follow from this?
A. The income distribution in the society is socially acceptable.
B. The economy is operating at a point on its production possibility frontier.
C. The conditions for allocative efficiency have been met.
D. The conditions for productive efficiency have been met.
Answer:A
B is wrong because the condition of pareto efficiency requires the operation on PPF.
C is wrong because the condition of pareto efficiency requires the allocative efficiency.
D is wrong because the condition of pareto efficiency requires the allocative efficiency.
3. What would be classified by economists as an increase in transfer payments?
A. The continuous more salary paid to the social workers because of covid-19.
B. Additional spending on public sector infrastructure
C. Extra spending for the aged-related pension
D. Transferring the spending from education to national defense
Answer: C
A is wrong because it is not transfer payment.
B is wrong because it is not transfer payment.
D is wrong because it is not transfer payment.
4. Which of following is a positive statement?
A. The U.S. government should increase income tax on high earners.
B. The U.S economic growth rate 4.5% less than that of China in 2015.
C. Economic growth in China was better than that of U.S.A.
D. Wages of those on low incomes ought to be increased.
Answer: B
A is wrong because it is normative statement.
C is wrong because it is normative statement.
D is wrong because it is normative statement.
5. Two players are negotiating where to place some object on Cartesian plane. They choose the coordinates (x, y) in the following way: player A sets the coordinate on the X-axis, player B sets the coordinate on the Y-axis. Player A wants the object to be as close as possible to the point (2, 4); player B wants the object to be as close as possible to the point (3, 1). Find the Nash equilibrium location of the object.
A. (3, 4)
B. (2.5, 2.5)
C. (2, 1)
D. (0,0)
Answer: C
To meet the requirement of both players, the Nash equilibrium should be on (2, 1) from the four possible answers.
6. Given the demand function Q= 700-2P+0.02Y, where P is the price and P=25, Y is the income and Y=5000, the price elasticity of demand and income elasticity of demand is ___.
A. -0.067, 0.133
B. 0.067, 0.133
C. 0.133, -0.067
D. 0.133, 0.067
Answer: A
PED(Ed)= -2* (25/750)= -0.067
YED(Ei)= 0.02* (5000/750) =0.133
7. The Sveriges Riksbank prize in economic science in memory of Alfred Nobel 2021was divided, one half awarded to David Card, ___
A. for his empirical contributions to labor economics
B. for his methodological contribution to labor economics
C. for his practical contributions to labor economics
D. for his positive contributions to labor economics
Answer: A
The 2021 Nobel economic sciences winters are David Card for his empirical contributions to labor economics and Joshua D. Angrist and Guido W. Imbens for their methodological contributions to the analysis of causal relationship.
8. Tom works 48 hours per week when the wage rate is $10 per hour. When the wage rate is increased to $15 per hour, Tom works 40 hours per week.
What explains the change in the number of hours worked?
A. There is no income effect
B. An income effect reinforcing a substitution effect
C. There is a negative income elasticity of demand for leisure
D. The income effect offsetting a substitution effect
Answer: D
A is wrong because there is income effect
B is wrong because the income effect offsetting a substitution effect
C is wrong because it is not related to income elasticity of demand